> -----Original Message----- > From: Kai Schaetzl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] kicking SPAM: AWL, custom rules > > > Guenther wrote on 26 May 2003 01:03:10 +0200: > > > header X_KNOWN_SPAMMER From =~ /@(domain\.com|spam\.(net|com))>?$/ > > > > You should simply reject these at the MTA level by access rules. > > > Kai >
Agreed! However someone like 22its4you.com don't send from this domain. They host the images on it. So I recommend _not_ using a Known_spammer rule as header, but rawbody. Spammers change this often as well. I didn't notice a HUGE hit over the long weekend. Anyone else see normal spam traffic? I didn't update my BL because I wanted to see stuff come in to test my rules. Not much at all. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
