> >Would it be wise (actually, would it do any harm) to have one BAYES
> >database for a whole site, instead of per-user basis? (Just a hand full
> >of users.)
>
> There are some advantages and some drawbacks here. On the advantage side as
> it learns from the spam of one user it can apply those lessons to another..
> however if your users get a wide variety of kinds of nonspam, it can also
> decrease the ability of the Bayes engine to classify spam by flooding it
> with a broad variety of nonspam symbols.
>
> Really it shouldn't be a big problem, but Bayes is more slightly accurate
> on a per-user basis.
OK, I will have that in mind and watch the results.
> >How can I do that? Did not find any note, how to define a site wide
> >BAYES database. TIA
>
> Just over ride the bayes_path to a fixed one instead of the default one
> which is relative to ~.
[...]
Thanks for explaining to me. :-)
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
