>From what I understand, spamassassin can only give a static score, there is no way to have score between 0 and max-score. and if we need a variable score we have to create several rules like BAYES_00,BAYES_01,...,BAYES_99 , and let all these rules executed. Although only the first rule will scan the message and save the score in a static variable, and other bayes rule will use this variable if it is executed, but I think this is not really efficient. It would be nice if we have only 1 bayes rule, for example BAYES_CHECK, and this rule will give you spam probability between 0.0 and 1.0 (and mapped to the score between -5.0 and 5.0). Ok, maybe there is a good reason why the bayes rule are splitted into 10 rules, and executed all of them, but there is also another reason to have a variable score, for example DCC test. At the moment you are out of luck if you are the number 999998 who check the same spam to dcc server, spamassassin will not give you any dcc score at all although you get Fuz2=999998 from dcc server, and it is abviously that the message is bulk email. and even if we get only 500000 for Body/Fuz1/Fuz2 , spamassassin still has to give us some dcc score, maybe half of the maximal score and not just zero score.
have a nice weekend :) cahya. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
