At 10:36 PM 9/11/03 -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
a SPAM message being learned as HAM?


X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-rc4 (1.203-2003-08-29-exp) on lerami.lerctr.org X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.60-rc4 MIME-Version: 1.0

What's your autolearn threshold set to? Is it greater than 0.2?


Remember that autolearning is done based on the score as if there was NO BAYES involved.

Thus the bayes_99 goes away. This will VERY significantly reduce the score of this particular message. The only rule left has a very small score:

score HTML_MESSAGE 0.160 0.001 0.100 0.100

So, poof, autlearned as ham, even though bayes_99 made it tag by adding another 5.4 points to it.




------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to