This has seemed to work for me as well. Like you pointed out the ones that have no .exe still manage to get in.
Scott On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 20:46, Dale Harris wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 11:37:27AM +1200, Simon Byrnand elucidated: > > > > Although I havn't tried it, I would say that teaching the message to BAYES > > using sa-learn in 2.60 should be very effective, as BAYES_99 in 2.60 has a > > high enough score to tag as spam without any other tests... > > > > > That and setting MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE to like 4.0 or higher seemed to do > the trick mostly in 2.55. Well, except for the ones that didn't have an > attachment, or just attached a GIF or something other than a virus laden > file. > > > -- > Dale Harris > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > /.-) > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
