-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Chris Santerre writes: >You know, the answer to this, is the answer to many questions. The solution >is the much needed accumulator eval. Yes you can get some FPs on 3-5 >consonants. But what if you set this rule to only hit if 4+ hits were found >of this rule? That would lesson the amount of FPs greatly. > >Many of us are finding we hit limits with simple regex rules. To me, an >accumulator eval for rules is the next logical step. > >Make sense? BTW, SpamAssassin originally started with accumulating rules. But I took it out, as it meant a long hammy mail had a much higher chance of FP'ing, due to containing more text. I'd be worried that accumulating hits would reintroduce the same problem... - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQE/q+IjQTcbUG5Y7woRAqGyAJ9TGcE4mxxSHNM6zj7IVezk9+LYEgCg39Jk dH1aAZlcJSdAcm3k17o1fVU= =Cxyd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
