Interesting mail header on this message:

Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from intrepid.intrepid.com (intrepid.intrepid.com [192.195.190.1])
        by screamer.intrepid.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9H4rhE029668
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:04:53 -0800
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net
[66.35.250.206])
        by intrepid.intrepid.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB9H4p5i012644
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:04:51 -0800
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.7]
helo=sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
        by sc8-sf-mx2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
        (Exim 4.24)
        id 1ATlFL-0003eK-0p; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:02:03 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]
helo=projects.sourceforge.net)
        by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
        id 1ATlFK-0004lf-7s; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 09:02:02 -0800
Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11]
helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net)
        by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
        id 1ATlEi-0004jq-5a
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 09 Dec 2003
09:01:24 -0800
Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64])
        by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
        id 1ATlEh-0008FU-G6
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 09 Dec 2003
09:01:23 -0800
Received: from thevsp8100 ([66.157.115.216]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
          Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:01:17 -0500
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Thomas Shoaf \(PromoStep\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: PromoStep, LLC
Message-ID:
<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAT4HxjKN1YEWXQYWQdbc3C8KAAAAQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0143_01C3BE4C.29279E00"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
Thread-Index: AcO+dhG3z3X/nnxeQY2J606z7taAfQ==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.
        See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
        Report problems to https://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001
        0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
        0.2 HTML_50_60             BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
        0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME   Message looks like Outlook, but isn't
Subject: [SAtalk] Content Analysis
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,

<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:01:21 -0500
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:01:21 -0500
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by sourceforge.net.
        See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
        Report problems to https://sf.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=1&atid=200001
        0.5 HTML_40_50             BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML
        0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
        0.1 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME   Message looks like Outlook, but isn't


1) It looks as if SourceForge has (finally?) moved to using Spamassassin for
mail filtering? (as of Sept. 19, 2003). But they don't indicate which
version
they are running.

2) However, the X-Spam mail headers are repeated?

3) The Message-ID is really long. Is that a valid/typical Message-ID?

4) SA thinks this was sent via a forged Outlook client. Is it, or this just
the latest Office(tm) version?

5) Of course, as always, it is a bit problematic having SA scan the SA talk
e-mail list ...


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thomas
Shoaf (PromoStep)
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Content Analysis


Hello Fellow SPAMASSASSIN Members... I am new to this list and I have a few
questions that would really help out a lot.

1) I have used the Content Checker over at Lyris - Is there such a Content
Checker available that I may use on my respective server that allows me to
checked my content before sending it out via email, etc.  I like the tool at
Lyris BUT I don't care to enter my personal information in everytime I use
it.

2) When looking at the list of TESTS,  how can you find out more information
on how to resolve such items which appear on the report... like how do you
fix...

0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset
1.9 MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY 'Content-Type' found without required MIME
headers
I appreciate any assistance.

Best regards,

Thomas Shoaf




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills.  Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials.  Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to