I get the "justified" part of your rule, but what about the rule references HTML? I'd consider renaming your rule to JUSTIFIED_74_EQUAL or some such.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Regis Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:35 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] RD: "justified" HTML > > > One type of spam I receive is a weirdly formatted HTML that > is exactly 74 > characters wide with an "=" at the end of each line. This may be in a > normal speicification. You can set your own scores. For me, > the score has > been wildly successful, 3000 spam in a week, no ham. > > full JUSTIFIED_HTML /(\n.{74}=){3,}/ > describe JUSTIFIED_HTML Body uses 74 char wide, justified HTML code > score JUSTIFIED_HTML 2.0 > > I read some articles that urge against the {} notation. Can > someone enlighten > me? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign > up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell > to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
