At Sat Dec 13 14:02:53 2003, J. S. Greenfield wrote: > > On a related note...I presume that when the bayesian classification runs > during normal operation, SA headers have not yet been added to the messages. > > Does that imply one needs to be careful to feed non-filtered messages > (i.e., without the spam assassin filters already added) when training > manually with sa-learn? Or does it not make much difference?
sa-learn knows what markup spamassassin adds, and simply ignores it. So, you don't need to worry about stripping the SA-markup before learning the message. > Also, what is shown in the SA headers when bayesian classification > contirbutes tot he score of a message? The X-Spam-Status header will include BAYES_xx in the tests= section, where the "xx" indicates the "level" it has been scored at (e.g. BAYES_00, BAYES_01, BAYES_10, ...) Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
