After enabling SA to use the RBL rules, SA was able to identify a lot more spam than it used to. However, it was still letting through quite a lot, so I just bumped the scores for the Spamcop and DSBL checks, which helped even more. (I also tried bumping SORBS and a couple of the others, but that led to a rash of false positives.)
So I'm just kinda wondering how the default RBL scores were derived. The default Spamcop score is 1.5 (when Bayes is enabled), and it looks to me as if Spamcop really has few false positives... (The RBLs aren't included in the GA process, are they?) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
