We are relatively new at using SA. Since posting this I have discovered that we were using rawbody for many filters. I found that using body that the tags are ignored and the filters are now catching the obfuscated text. We are running SA 2.61.
Thanks. Chip On 1/2/2004 8:43:07 PM wrote: > > > On Friday 02 January 2004 10:21 am, Chip Sutton wrote: > > > We have been receiving a lot of messages that are not being scored high > > enough because in addition to the random words, they are obfuscating the > > text in the html section with bogus tags. Here is an excerpt > from one that > > I looked at. > > > > > > <p>O</affirm>ur U</dosage>S Li</errantry>censed Doc</pressure>tors > > wi</mouthful>ll<BR> > > Prescr</football>ibes Y</fritz>our Me</tecum>dication F</guard>or > > F</tenderloin>ree > > SA has, for some time, been able to deal with this sort of thing, > because it > simply ignores *all* HTML tags when tooking for words/phrases, including > invlaid ones. Could you send a copy of the analyzed spam (including SA > headers), plus give us the exact version of SA you are using? > > Thanks. > >
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
