-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Robin Lynn Frank writes: >On Monday 12 January 2004 17:31, Bob Proulx wrote: >> Chuck Peters wrote: >> > Can someone explain why HABEAS_SWE -8.0 was allowed to happen? >> >> Robin Lynn Frank wrote: >> > Shorter answer. Habeus rule is outahere. >> >> And many other people, not just these two, had the same sentiments. >> Which really saddens me. > ><brevity snip> > >Bob, > >I have no problem with Habeas' method of dealing with those who abuse their >mark. It's a great idea. But on a whim, I did a few whois inquiries on some >of the domains involved and found that the contact information bounced from >one country to the next. If I had the time, I suspect I'd find that I'd gone >full circle back to the first domain contact. In other words, I'm not sure >they can find someone real to sue. They certainly did before, in the case of similar forgery and intercontinental evasion. Also, their business model depends on prosecution in cases like this, as Bob pointed out. PS: whoever was suggesting they'd be blackholing any mails containing the SWE mark -- don't forget that all of my mail for at least a year has contained it -- so, seeya ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAA1xVQTcbUG5Y7woRAgdBAJwMEAXTJNtdVWkoPxGHutx/Rd55OACdEGhH eCyHsXhRPQNGDxqFRe129x0= =N/ZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
