Hi there!
especially bob, who answered to my mail recently :)
Now I am subscribed to this list *phew*
>Konstantin Kletschke wrote:
>
>> mails which mostly contained only a html message, which mutt does
>> display as an attachement, if ever.
>This is off topic, but in mutt if you press 'v' it will view the mime
>attachments.
Yes, I figured out now. One "v" does the trick. I thought mutt
announces attachements in initial view, but may be an empty text part
hid it.
>> I wanted to adjust SA to recognize this as spam but it IS already
>> spam, but not completely, hey, look yourself.
>Huh?
I wanted to pont out, that:
>> Jan 3 13:16:14 zappa spamd[12088]: info: setuid to konsti succeeded
>> Jan 3 13:16:14 zappa spamd[12088]: processing message \
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for konsti:1000.
>> Jan 3 13:16:14 zappa spamd[12088]: clean message (4.4/6.5) for
^^^ NOT spam
>What is important about the above logfile snippet? I am missing the
>point.
Simply the NOT spam thing.
>> Same mail now in a debug session:
Which is not a debug session, But run by hand with spamassassin directly.
> X-Spam-Level: ******
> X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.7 required=6.5 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_70_80,
^^^ SPAM
Both _same_ mail.
Thats my point. Hope it is clear now :)
>> Where does the difference come from?
>Difference from what? What question are you asking? Please state the
>nature of the medical emergency.
Difference between spamd<->spamassassin
But since then I found the Problem. It was debian's enabled
whitelisting of spamd!
After I switched it off, spamassassin and spamc runs yielded in same
points (over threshold :)).
So that is solved.
But the last days I discover same thing. I get spams in my mail folder
and wonder, why they where not recognized. I copy them to server then
and pipe them throuch spamassassin -t and they get enough points and
are considered spam. ->? When I pipe them through spamc, they do not
get enough points.
I added "skip_rbl_checks 0" to /etc/spamassassin/default, may be then
both tools get same result?
My main question is, where comes difference from? It was the -a switch
which is now off from spamd here, but now?
I tried to explain the actual issue in another mail postet to this ml
this evening...
>None of those may have applied to this message. Try this instead.
>Score HTML_MESSAGE 5
Ok, fixed now :)
[...]
>> auto_learn 0
>> required_hits 6.5
>>
>> But in my understanding it already is considered from both...
>Huh?
I meant, these settings are read from spamassassin and spamc/spamd.
Regards, Konsti
--
2.6.0-test10-mm1
Konstantin Kletschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG KeyID EF62FCEF
Fingerprint: 13C9 B16B 9844 EC15 CC2E A080 1E69 3FDA EF62 FCEF
keulator.homelinux.org up 7:56, 3 users
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
