On January 16, 2004 12:55 pm, Rich Puhek wrote: > I use a slightly different approach. > > I filter my emails into 4 different IMAP folders: slightly-spammy, > somewhat-spammy, pretty-spammy, and very spammy. The filtering is based > on increasing number of SA hits (actually the X-Spam-Level: header, and > the number of "*" characters). > > I also have a to-learn folder, with a pair of subfolders: ham and spam, > which are not automatically populated. > > Any FN that land in my inbox are manually moved to the to-learn.spam > folder.
And I use a slightly different approach. I prepend the subject of suspected spam with [SA NN.NN], where NN.NN is the score. Then I can simply sort by subject, and do quick checks for FP's ... Well, *I* think it's handy anyway. This way, I only deal with one spam folder. Pedro -- To be intoxicated is to feel sophisticated but not be able to say it. ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
