Hello David,

Saturday, January 24, 2004, 8:01:24 PM, you wrote:

DH> I've been playing with bayes on my home machine and have been very impressed
DH> with it.  I was however wondering to what degree everyone else trusts
DH> BAYES_99?  Is it generally accepted as a sure spamsign or do you expect ti
DH> to be backed up by other scores I order to rank it as definite spam?

I score Bayes-99 right at my required hits threshold.

I not only use auto-learn, but even with auto-learn I hand feed just
about every non-SATALK email into Bayes via sa-learn, after manual
verification of the spam/ham status.

Bob Menschel

The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
Spamassassin-talk mailing list

Reply via email to