On Thursday 05 February 2004 15:59, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: > FVGT_b_VIAGRA ????? > > Where is this rule? > I have looked in the emporium....must be overlooking it somewhere? > > Thanks > > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 February 2004 11:47 > To: 'Keith Dowell'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: *****SPAM***** Ok - this is getting a little ridiculous. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Keith Dowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 4:35 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: *****SPAM***** Ok - this is getting a little ridiculous. > > > > > > Here's one I just got that got through. Is there a blatant > > stupidity filter > > for this junk out there? > > > > > > On stock: ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] , Pn.t.ermin > .Valium. . [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > =3D S0m@ & A`t|[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <p> > > Plus: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:o|, U, L.3v|tra, Pr0:p3cia, Acyc|0vi`r, > > Pr0z@:c, [EMAIL PROTECTED], B= > > u:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ad|pe:x, I0`nam|n, M3ridi.a, X.3nica|, Ambi.3n, > > S0naT`a, Fl3xe'ril= > > ARGH! Since the site moved, I'm now filtering it. I have to fix that!!! You > hit this (Notice this is including a NEGATIVE AWL!!!!) > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.8 required=5.0 > tests=AF_MEDICAMENTOS,AWL,FVGT_b_VIAGRA,MY_HELO, > OACYS_DISGUISED_P0RN,RM_rb_PARA,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 > > X-Spam-Report: 5.80 hits, 5 required; > * 0.3 -- May be valid but catches most. > * 6.0 -- BODY: Tries to slip through filters by substituting numbers for > letters > * 2.5 -- BODY: Medicamento encontrado > * 1.5 -- BODY: FVGT - mentions viagra > * 0.8 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 00 to 01 (low) > * 0.0 -- BODY: Testing for HTML Paragraph in emails > * -5.3 -- AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment > > So give AF_MEDICAMENTOS and FVGT_b_VIAGRA a try.
Perhaps there needs to be a nn% mispelled rule or a "phrase makes no grammatical sense" rule for those emails which include a list of random words ! Bob
