At Sat Feb 7 10:11:40 2004, Paul Boven wrote: > > 2. Ham that got marked as spam. Since spam messages get altered so that > > the spammy message becomes an attachment to the spam info, when I get a > > ham that got caught as spam, I suspect that I need to move the > > "original" message to my ham folder, not the "altered" message? ie. If > > I move the altered message to the ham folder, the message will contain > > all of the spam info and the actual message will still be an > > attachement. the alternative is that they need to open the attachment > > to see the original ham message and then move THAT message into the ham > > folder. ??? > > According to a post just a few lines down in the list, 'sa-learn removes > SpamAssassin markup?' Martin Radford writes: > "On my system, '-d' does remove all the markup, including converting the > attachement back to the main body of the mail."
... except that if you read that mail, you see I was referring to the command "spamassassin -d", not sa-learn. However, sa-learn knows what SA's markup looks like, and will remove it when learning, so this is not a problem. See http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/BayesInSpamAssassin : It's OK to feed emails with Spamassassin markup into the sa-learn command -- sa-learn will ignore any standard Spamassassin headers, and if the original email has been encapsulated into an attachment it will decapsulate the email. In other words sa-learn will undo any changes which Spamassassin has done before learning the spam/ham character of the email. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V
