On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:17 am, Matthew Trent wrote: > Sorry to beat a dead horse, but what I thought was a harmless error took > down Exim last night. I've posted previously (as have others) about this > error in my Exim paniclog: > > 2004-02-10 01:06:04 1AqTqC-00083u-Rd string_sprintf expansion was longer > than 8192
Oh yeah, and, as an addendum, I realize it's easy enough to raise the header size limit in the Exim source, but I still think there is a practical/reasonable limit to how big a report should be and how verbose any one ruleset should be. Changing the size limit is just a workaround... -- Matt Systems Administrator Local Access Communications 360.330.5535
