On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:45 am, Raquel Rice wrote: > > Oh yeah, and, as an addendum, I realize it's easy enough to raise > > the header size limit in the Exim source, but I still think there > > is a practical/reasonable limit to how big a report should be and > > how verbose any one ruleset should be. Changing the size limit is > > just a workaround...-- > > Matt > > I don't know if you're looking for input, so I'll offer my point of > view. I like to keep tabs on what rules are working and which are > not. I like having the ability to make adjustments if I feel it's > necessary. Without the headers, especially "X--Spam-Report:", it's > difficult to do that. I like having the headers there.
I think you're missing my point... I like the headers... I can't live without 'em, they're great. My complaint is only about extraneous information in the report. If the Tripwire set hits 30 times, I don't want 30 lines just for Tripwire. I think it would be more appropriate to have 1 line saying something like "Tripwire: 30 hits, 7 points". In addition, with all these custom sets floating around in addition to the stock rules, it would be nice to have a configurable limit on report size. -- Matt Systems Administrator Local Access Communications 360.330.5535
