On Tuesday 10 February 2004 12:40 pm, Raquel Rice wrote:
> > Yes, I realize that. However, 8k seems like plenty to me, and I'd
> > rather see a real solution than a workaround. The way it's going
> > right now, that report can be DARN long, and eventually it may hit
> > the limit again, even if you up it...
> > --
> > Matt
>
> And, I ask again.  Why is changing SpamAssassin a "fix" and changing
> a setting in Exim a "workaround"?

Because if SA has absolutely no limit, no matter how high I set Exim, that 
limit can always be reached.

It seems like these new rules constitute a new "genre" of large rule sets with 
many small and similar rules all designed to work together. Perhaps there are 
special considerations that need to be taken for them. They do seem to work 
well (props to the creators/maintainers), so I'm sure many people are or will 
be using them.
-- 
Matt
Systems Administrator
Local Access Communications
360.330.5535

Reply via email to