On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:42:51AM -0700, you [Bob Proulx] wrote: > > Could you tag all of the spam messages and then ;| them (tag-prefix > pipe-message) them to a script such as 'formail' which would pick them > apart? That would batch them all up. One caveat is that tag piping > does not make a strict mbox format message (in my version of mutt) and > might be a problem for some tools. Try ;| a set of mesages to less > (e.g. ";|less") and browsing the raw format and you will see what I > mean.
I will check the tag pipe approach (I didn't know such feature existed in mutt :). Thanks. But I'm not completely sure how this is better than the spool dir hack I have, since I still need to feed the mail through formail to spamassassin. I dunno. Perhaps it was naive to think there would be an easier way. -- v -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
