----- Original Message -----
From: "Raquel Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: Why some don't get scanned?
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:51:55 -0500
> "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 7:46 PM
> > Subject: Why some don't get scanned?
> >
> >
> > > I have an occasional mail that doesn't appear to get evaluated
> > > by my SA. The headers below are from a mail that was forwarded
> > > from an off-site account to my Linux machine running SA. I get
> > > lots of mail this way(forwarded from other accts), and almost
> > > all get evaluated properly - So
> > why
> > > would an occasional mail NOT get an SA eval? Here are the
> > > headers of one that got through without an eval. It obviously
> > > was tagged at the -other- server, but again, I have others like
> > > this that DO get the ususal eval by -MY- SA.
> > >
> > > SpamAssassin (score=13.708, required 6
> > SpamAssassin (score=10.019, required 6
> > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=21.5 required=5.0
>
> Given the results, above, I'm not sure how you can say that it's not
> being evaluated.
I was afraid someone would say that. It's because it -is- being evaluated
by SA at the first server, but not again at my server. Others get eval by
the first server AND my server. I posted another example of one that gets
evaluated by BOTH servers - My SA adds a different tag ([SPAM] instead of
{Spam?}) and doesn't have the "X-yoursite-MailScanner" part etc etc (See my
followup post with TWO examples.) Tnx
