We got a score of 5.92: 5.40 BAYES_99 Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100% 0.29 DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN From: sender listed in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org 0.10 HTML_MESSAGE HTML included in message 0.05 LG_4C_2V_3C Gibberish found? 0.00 RM_rb_ANCHOR Testing for HTML end of anchor in emails 0.00 RM_rb_BODY Testing for HTML BODY in emails 0.00 RM_rb_BREAK Testing for HTML Break in emails 0.00 RM_rb_HTML Testing for HTML tag in emails 0.08 TW_OQ Odd Letter Triples with OQ
Loads of ham use the X-AntiAbuse headers, but there might be one subset which is spam-only. Phil --------------------------------------------- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 February 2004 18:09 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Logo spams > > > Randal, Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm starting to think that only spammers uses the following > > sorts of headers: > > > > X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please > > include it with any abuse report > > X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - onsitemail.com > > X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - onsitemail.com > > X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [80 80] / [80 80] > > X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - > > Won't (and if not, why?) bayes pick these up? > > - Bob >
