We got a score of 5.92:

5.40    BAYES_99        Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
0.29    DNS_FROM_RFCI_DSN       From: sender listed in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org
0.10    HTML_MESSAGE    HTML included in message
0.05    LG_4C_2V_3C     Gibberish found?
0.00    RM_rb_ANCHOR    Testing for HTML end of anchor in emails
0.00    RM_rb_BODY      Testing for HTML BODY in emails
0.00    RM_rb_BREAK     Testing for HTML Break in emails
0.00    RM_rb_HTML      Testing for HTML tag in emails
0.08    TW_OQ   Odd Letter Triples with OQ

Loads of ham use the X-AntiAbuse headers, but there might be one subset
which is spam-only.

Phil

---------------------------------------------
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 February 2004 18:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Logo spams
> 
> 
> Randal, Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm starting to think that only spammers uses the following
> > sorts of headers:
> > 
> > X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please
> > include it with any abuse report
> > X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - onsitemail.com
> > X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - onsitemail.com
> > X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [80 80] / [80 80]
> > X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
> 
> Won't (and if not, why?) bayes pick these up?
> 
> - Bob
> 

Reply via email to