On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 10:37, Bram Mertens wrote: > On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 00:42, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Bram Mertens wrote: > > > debug: bayes: 29656 tie-ing to DB file R/O > > > /home/m8ram/.spamassassin/bayes_toks > > > debug: bayes: 29656 tie-ing to DB file R/O > > > /home/m8ram/.spamassassin/bayes_seen > > > debug: bayes: found bayes db version 0 > > > > See, that's the thing... Your SA install hasn't updated the DB to v2 yet.
Thanks Theo! That did it! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> sa-learn -p /home/m8ram/.spamassassin/user_prefs --dump magic 0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 8736 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 62058 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 136848 0 non-token data: ntokens 0.000 0 1058120598 0 non-token data: oldest atime 0.000 0 1077607934 0 non-token data: newest atime 0.000 0 1077608525 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime 0.000 0 1077574102 0 non-token data: last expiry atime 0.000 0 2764800 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta 0.000 0 1272932 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count And more than 50% of all messages SA previously misclassified as ham are now classified as spam! Should I add this [problem with the db-version] to the wiki? Regards Bram -- # Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux User #249103 # # SuSE Linux 8.2 (i586) kernel 2.4.20-4GB i686 256MB RAM # # 9:11am up 32 days 12:50, 7 users, load average: 0.12, 0.05, 0.06 #
