Sorry, I'm so behind on the list, but I wanted to reply to this one.  I
used Outlook (and Pegasus, and Netscape, and Eudora, etc etc.) for a
long time bouncing back and forth until I finally searched Download.com
and downloaded and installed every client they had.  and that was lots
of them.  I finally found an email client I liked. 

It is not only a great email client, it's also the only peice of
shareware in my 25 years behind a computer that I have registered. 
That's a considerable accomplishment because the software doens't even
disable after the 30 days.

At least one other person on this list uses it, it's called Rebecca.   
(Becky! for short)

Everything in that list on your website Becky can do.  The only
exception is that it won't purge attachments.  it will however build
them and put them in a seperate folder as files, making them really easy
to scan.  HTML mail can be viewed as HTML, HTML source, or converted to
text.   and it will strip scripts when you view using the IE component.

It will also save and read .eml files.  and is MAPI compatible.  The
programmer is also very responsive on bug and feature implementations. 
You can see it at http://www.rimarts.co.jp/  

You don't HAVE to use Outlook.  However admittedly other outlook
features including it's mutual embedding into the business apps of today
makes it very hard to get along without.  I use it for everything except
Email.  And Outlook hates that.


Bryan Britt
Beltane Web Services


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ICQ: 53037451
Bryan L. Britt                                        501-327-8558
Beltane Web Services, Conway, AR            http://www.beltane.com
~~~~~~~~~~Support Private Communications on the Internet~~~~~~~~~~



----------------------- Original Message -----------------------
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:39:58 +0100, Jens Benecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> <ver�ffentlicht & per Mail versendet>
> 
> Geoff Dyment wrote:
> 
> > [1]This is not a jab at MS.  This is not saying that you made crappy
> > choices.  This is not saying that if it's not Linux, it's crap.  This is
> > saying that, IMHO, Outlook Express does not suffice on *any* desktop as a
> > mail client.  If Free is your perogative, check out Eudora, Thunderbird,
> > and Opera.  I'm sure there are plenty of others.  But OE just doesn't cut
> > it.IMHO.
> 
> Yup. I agree. Outlook is today's virus petri dish, cannot quote properly,
> cannot thread properly, uses 8-bit characters in mail headers, etc etc etc.
> But recently some people have showed me things that most "other" clients
> seem to lack, which i can understand CAN be important for office use.
> See also www.jensbenecke.de/l-oe-en.php :)
> 
> I would really like you to show me a mail client that does those things.
> 
> For example, I've seen people save project related mails to the same
> directory where all the other project files are (as .EML). This makes
> sense, you don't want to seperate stuff where no seperation is really
> needed. A 4MB presentation with a 10k explanatory mail doesn't NEED to stay
> in your (and all the team members') mailbox, it can be put on a network
> share. 
> 
> Also, neither Mozilla nor KMail nor anything except Mutt is able to _delete_
> attachments from mails (AFAIK), which is actually part of the above
> problem.
> 
> This bug/wishlist has been in both Mozilla's and KMails Bugzilla for YEARS
> but it hasn't been implemented yet. And, frankly, it is THE one reason I
> occasionally SSH into our IMAP server and fire up Mutt on one of my
> Maildirs.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jens Benecke


Reply via email to