Hello Loren,
Saturday, February 28, 2004, 1:49:48 AM, you wrote:
LW> Going through a few spams tonight, I came up with a small handful of
LW> possibly useful rules.
LW> I'd appreciate it if anyone who has a corpus set up and some spare cpu
LW> cycles could test these and see if they are actually any good.
LW> Thanks,
LW> Loren
Results:
(First numeric frequencies, followed by percentage frequencies)
OVERALL SPAM HAM S/O SCORE NAME
106532 87317 19215 0.820 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
7595 7595 0 1.000 1.00 10.00 PT_WORDLIST_30
244 244 0 1.000 0.99 1.00 DES_ENC_STMP
1665 1661 4 0.989 0.95 1.00 X_BOGUS_MAILER
1653 1647 6 0.984 0.93 0.50 BOGUS_SUBJECT
345 342 3 0.962 0.86 1.00 X_UNAUTHENTIC_WARNING
0 0 0 0.500 0.00 0.10 BOGUS_MSGID
0 0 0 0.500 0.00 1.00 STMP_NO_ID
OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
106532 87317 19215 0.820 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
100.000 81.9632 18.0368 0.820 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
7.129 8.6982 0.0000 1.000 1.00 10.00 PT_WORDLIST_30
0.229 0.2794 0.0000 1.000 0.99 1.00 DES_ENC_STMP
1.563 1.9023 0.0208 0.989 0.95 1.00 X_BOGUS_MAILER
1.552 1.8862 0.0312 0.984 0.93 0.50 BOGUS_SUBJECT
0.324 0.3917 0.0156 0.962 0.86 1.00 X_UNAUTHENTIC_WARNING
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 0.10 BOGUS_MSGID
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.00 1.00 STMP_NO_ID
Bob Menschel
