John,
 
I also experienced the exact same thing.  The default setup with no bayes 
training really let most of my spam through our filters.
 
I chose to let the auto training of bayes to work and it did well since I get 
to see at least 10,000 spams a day.  Along with adding additional cf's I have 
moved my threshold back towards 5.0.  I'm still sitting at 3.5, but will 
eventually probably move it to 5.0.
 
For the newbie thomas, I also watched what spam was getting under my threshold 
and then adjusted I'd say about 2 dozen of the individual scores to help bring 
the low scoring spam up nearer to 5.0.  You'll have to watch which ones you up 
though ie: I brought HTML_MESSAGE up too high and started getting a lot of 
false positives.
 
Good Luck
 
Scott

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: John Fleming [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Tue 3/2/2004 6:17 AM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: NEWBIE: Not extremely happy with SA filtering so far
        
        


        ----- Original Message -----
        From: "Thomas Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:10 AM
        Subject: NEWBIE: Not extremely happy with SA filtering so far
        
        
        > SpamAssassins,
        >
        > I've been trying out CommuniGate in conjunction with SpamAssassin for 
a
        > while, and I must say my old client-side filter (Spammunition) caught 
a
        > lot more spams than the default setup of SpamAssassin are doing now. I
        > have the overall score threshold set to 5.0, but a lot of spam has 
only
        > a score of 2-3 anyway. I probably have to tweak it a lot more in order
        > to catch the subset of spam aimed to my addresses.
        >
        > In particular I need some more rules that can take all the viagra
        > variants (like Generi*c V-iagra Half Price Guaran-teed etc).
        >
        > Forgive me being a total novice, is it a central storage where rules 
can
        > be downloaded and deployed (probably need a how-to description as 
well)?
        >
        > Any input/comments would be much appreciated.
        >
        
        I'm new too - Initially I settled on a threshhold of 2.4, and this got 
most
        things with a few false positives.  Then I trained my Bayes with 400 
spams
        and 200-some hams and added most of the rules from
        http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm  Now my
        threshhold is back up to 5.0 and it's almost perfect for me!  Good luck 
-
        John
        
        
        

Reply via email to