Hallo!
Well, this is a bit strange. I got a spam with some very obvious
spam 'taglines' in it, and went looking for the reason it scored so low.
As seen below, SA hit on the 'excuses' but scored them ridiculously low.
Is there really any ham that uses those excuses that they need to be
scored so low? (Scores are for SA without Bayes, but with RBL checks.)
- Charles
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ....
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=3.5 autolearn=no tests=EARN_MONEY=1.118,
EXCUSE_16=0.171,EXCUSE_3=0.1,MAILTO_TO_REMOVE=0.037,RCVD_IN_SBL=1.271
Subject: [2.7] Average $1,500 to $9,000 weekly in cash
Using this Automated System, members are averaging $1,500 per week,
including a single mom who made $31,000 in Dec. The earning potential
is unlimited, and this system does all the selling.
Take advantage and learn more by clicking the link below:
http://www.formreply.com/oneup/50/1108/cap22.html
This E-mail is a Commercial Advertisement.
If you received this message in error or if you wish to be removed from our
mailing list send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "rem" in the
subject line.
This email is in compliance with all US Federal Email Laws.
120 S. Houghton Rd. #138, PMB 197
Tucson, AZ 85748
