-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
>At 01:28 PM 3/3/04 +0300, Eugene Morozov wrote:
>>This is mostly a toy benchmark but I would like to hear
>>suggestions on how results can be imroved.
>>Eugene
>
>If you really only want to compare the speed of the bayes engines, remove
>or zero-out the scores of all the non-bayes rules from SA.
Matt, I think he said he did that ;)
BTW SpamAssassin also rewrites the messages with spamc -- so DSpam's
addition of an ID string is not really higher-overhead than that. in fact
it's possibly less complex than the SpamAssassin
entire-message-encapsulation report stuff.
If it would be possible to inhibit DSpam's ID string addition, then
testing with that, and with SpamAssassin set to give just the score
instead of the marked-up msg ("spamc -c" or similar), might also be more
accurate -- as that would remove the markup overhead from the timings,
too.
Also, running multiple times and averaged of course ;)
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFARix2QTcbUG5Y7woRAu7iAJ0XfPnBYxubp7Lvgqm7Xk3Yf3vQ/QCdGU8N
NRi10+NIyTbQ6pdzlAgpnaQ=
=O0L9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
