On Wednesday 03 March 2004 15:27, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 07:15 PM 3/3/2004, John Andersen wrote:
> >I got a mail (from myself) that had a POSITIVE whitelist value of 19
> >which caused it to be called spam.
> >
> >How is this possible and what do I do to adjust that?
>
> Hmm.. can you post an X-Spam-Status so we can see exactly what you mean by
> "positive whitelist"?
>
> Do you mean a positive AWL contribution? That's quite possible, as the AWL
> isn't a whitelist. It's a "score averaging system which has an effect of
> automaticaly white and blacklisting senders based on their past scores"
>
> Did you perchance send yourself some GTUBE emails, and then try to send
> normal ones and suddenly find strong positive scores? If so, do a
> spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist and wipe out your AWL table.
>
> Theoretically the AWL should ignore GTUBE, but apparently a bug got
> introduced and it started including it again. AFAIK it's fixed in the CVS
> code, but it's still broken in SA 2.63.
Ah, I bet thats EXACTLY whats happening, I did in fact try a gtube a day
or two ago. (And yes its 2.63).
Nasty bug that... Is there a warning on the page that I missed?
Here is what I got...
Content analysis details: (13.6 points, 4.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
19 AWL AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment
--
_____________________________________
John Andersen
