Loren Wilton <lwilton <at> earthlink.net> writes: > > There doesn';t seem > to be a whole lot to go on here. > > ----------------------------------------------- > Subject: Biggest meedication site on net, Lwilton! Exceptional offers for > you! > Greatest ViagWyra and Cialydis > Quick weight (hemispheroidal plyers) loss and anti-depressant meedication! > Best cost on ValiuuGm and XanaNnx > Best deals, 80 pcenert off! > You are completely anonymous! > > Cheap ViagV= > Cra and Cialvgis=2e<BR> > Fast weight (nonenvious fantocine) loss and antidepressant medicatimfon!<= > BR>Best price on Valiuatm and XanaLjx=2e<BR> > Super deals, 80 pnceert off!<BR>We are able to ship wdrolwide<BR><BR>Here= > you will find it:<BR><A=20 > href=3d"http://impertinent=2eselcydc=2ecom/d13/index=2ephp?id=3dd13";>http= > ://selcydc=2ecom/d13/index=2ephp?id=3dd13</A><BR>You are really anonymou=
How about the following: Valiu in the English dictionary is enough to nail Valium antidepressant or anti-depressant exceptional offers - I wonder how good this would do as a general rule completely anonymous - same for this one super deals, best deals Someone who is good at writing rules could probably create a rule that checks for too many superlatives: best, greatest, super, exceptional, biggest, quick, completely - and increases the score depending on how many of these occur. They could also probably get the "Fast weight" followed by "loss" within x characters "Biggest" followed by "site on net" or "web" within x characters Are you running the antidrug rules? Some of these might be decent rules Some meta combinations of some of those should avoid FPs. Al
