Once again, a suggestion for a rule based on the number of
matches/occurences. I still say this should be a generic mechanism
in SA, allowing flexible scoring, including zero for low counts.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Al Danks wrote:
> Does anyone have a rule along this line:
>
> Many superlatives-est: best, greatest, quickest, biggest, largest, etc.
>
> Many superlatives-er:super, bigger, larger, quicker, thinner, etc.
>
> Many superlatives exceptional, quick, completely, totally, absolutely
>
> I'm thinking of something along the lines of:
>
> body MANY_SUPERLATIVES_EST \b[best|greatest|quickest]\b/i{5}
>
> another for 6, 7, 8, 9, at least 10.
>
> Since I'm totally new to rule writing I hope I'm in the ballpark enough to
> communicate what I'm trying to do, but I don't expect what I have will work.
>
> Al
>
