On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 06:24:08PM -0500, Rose, Bobby wrote: > But if your using SpamAssassin or some other scoring based spam software > what difference does it make since it's merely just another test like > the RBLs.
I'd just as soon have my tests add score only to likely spam. That's hardly the situation during SPF's early adoption period. > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark C. Langston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Opinions About SPF > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:49:22PM -0800, Dan Wilder wrote: > > If on the other hand you do: > > > > SPF Sent > > record from listed Suspect > > exists host spam > > ------- ----------- --------- > > no -- no > > > ...which is not the recommendation of SPF. The default assumption is, > "no SPF record == bad, evil spammer." Yuck! You sure about that!?! -- Dan Wilder
