-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Steve Prior writes:
> This non spam went over the threshold because 68.198.15.112 is listed
> on three different lists, but in fact appears to be one of the legit yahoo
> mail servers (the friend who sent this to me did so from a Yahoo mail 
> account).
> 
> Do all three blacklists need updating?

that's not the Yahoo mailserver -- it's the originating machine.

Received: from [68.198.15.112] by web11405.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 09 Mar 
2004 09:19:21 PST
                                                              ^^^^
                                                              note

- --j.

> Steve
> 
> Content analysis details:   (5.3 points, 5.0 required)
> 
>   pts rule name              description
> ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
>   0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS      From: ends in numbers
>   0.1 TW_XS                  BODY: Odd Letter Triples with XS
>   0.1 TW_YX                  BODY: Odd Letter Triples with YX
>   1.1 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR    URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email
>   0.5 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP   RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
>                              [68.198.15.112 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
>   0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS          RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
>                              [68.198.15.112 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
>   0.1 RCVD_IN_NJABL          RBL: Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org
>                              [68.198.15.112 listed in dnsbl.njabl.org]
>   2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK      RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address
>                              [68.198.15.112 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFATgSJQTcbUG5Y7woRAmKdAJ9EVfGaFymE0CJTSXzswJPCf3676ACeO+vg
AVTpR4+9RJooHZxyhrDjpQ8=
=6xPr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to