Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Currently it's named after half of what it does "auto > whitelist"... you could rename it "auto white black list", but > people will still be confused thinking of it as "declaring spam > as whitelisted for adding a negative score".
It's true that the function is hard to give a short name to, but using "whitelist" in the name makes it far worse than other short-and-thus-incompletely-descriptive names. The name naturally gives people the impression that AWL is somehow connected with the whitelist options, but it's not related at all. It's also confusing to have an "autowhitelist adjustment" that can be positive. Besides, the adjustments it makes are in most cases not large enough to be referred to as whitelisting or blacklisting. "Score averaging" or "historical adjustment" or any other possibility that avoids "whitelist" would be preferable and avoid a lot of confusion. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC
