> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hackworth, Keith A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 1:12 PM
> To: R Michael Harman
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: possibly a dumb comment, apologies if I'm being a n00b
> 
> 
> I've worked on one and it's working great for me.  The only problem is
> that I had to modify the EvalTests.pm file that came in SA, 
> so I'll have
> to add it again when I upgrade.  The rule only applies to the subject.
> I haven't officially tested it, but it's running in my production
> environment due to its success.  I'd appreciate any comments on this,
> besides me not officially testing it first 8+), and would REALLY
> appreciate it if someone could test it.


Yeah, I have a comment......FINALY!!! :) 

I've looked at this for a while and it seems really cool.  But I don't
publish anyones work like this unless they give me permission. This gem was
buring a hole in my hard drive for quite some time! :)  My question is for
JM on this. Is there a penalty for readin this info from a file? Does it get
reread everytime the rule is run? ANd finally, do changes to the control
file get picked up right away, or do you still need to restart spamd. 

Also on the subject of OBFU, check out this link:

http://www.exit0.us/index.php/ChrissMediocreObfuScript

hth,

Chris

Reply via email to