Wow, I was thinking about writing my own SpamD for Windows using Delphi and active state's PerlEZ.dll or make an ActiveX object for the Perl portion and not use PerlEZ.dll. Though, I was slowed down when I read that PerlEZ can create multiple interpreters, but it can only run one at time. This kind of defeats part of the purpose of SPAMD. Though, I guess, not reloading a single interpreter is a lot better then loading it each and every time? Apparently, the if you make an ActiveX object using the Perl Dev Kit, you can somehow run multiple ones in threads. Though, there is mention of blocking, that I haven't quite deciphered yet.
Anyway, whose doing this SpamDPP? Do they have an estimated completion date? I will certainly volunteer to test it. Thanks Mark DeMichele > -----Original Message----- > From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 9:23 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: SA 2.63 on Win XP slow as molasses > > There is a C++ version for Win32 coming real soon, the guy wrote SpamCPP > and > SpamDPP. > Win32 people can run spamc and spamd with ActiveState perl, no more > needing > cygwin. > It requires perl 5.8.3 and it'll probably be released soon.. > > That vb version of WinSpamC I wrote is not good for large loads, I should > put a notice, "Not for Business Use!"... > > Freddy > > > Robert Lacroix wrote: > > Hi, > > > > better use SpamD in Cygwin with winspamc.exe ! > > > > > http://news.spamassassin.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=artic le > &sid=55&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0 > > > > Regards, Robert > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of No Spam Today! > The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use. > You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license! To order > or to find out more please visit: http://www.no-spam-today.com
