On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:37:20AM -0600, Chris Thielen wrote: > It's also my opinion that an OO redesign in perl would have many of the > same architectural benefits of a Java rewrite. To me, OO Perl is fugly > and confusing, but again I am a Java developer, not a Perl developer. > Also, there already are development efforts to clean up the internal > architecture, and new OO stuff like the plugin framework are coming soon, > which can be considered the beginnings of an OO redesign (at least for > parts of SA).
We are working to improve the OO design for SpamAssassin 3.0 without re-writing everything. Would you care to take a look at the code and suggest any improvements? Also, you can look at this thread where we discuss many of the issues we want to address. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107472222800002&r=1&w=2 Feel free to file bug reports with suggestions so we don't lose them. Thanks, -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
