Does anyone have a rule that hits on the funky characters in this email (there are a LOT of "ë" "ì" etc. obfuscating characters)?
TIA, Rubin (stemming the tide; bad Bayes database... BAD! Go away you and relearn WTF is spam and what's not!) On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 08:50, Rubin Bennett wrote: > I keep getting these (10-15 in the past few days) that sneak through and > it appears to be due to the funky characters not being caught in the > regex's. I noticed that my local.cf had "ok_languages all" so I changed > that to "en" - will that stem the tide on these? > > And is it just me, or have the spammers figured out a few new tricks > that are giving SA a really hard time? I used to get 1-2 spams per week > that made it through SA, and now (last 2 weeks or so) I'm getting > 10-15/day (out of a total of about 125-150 spams) that are getting > through. Is there a magic combination of rulesets that folks are using > to stop these messages? > I'm using antidrug, backhair, bigevil, evilnumbers, chickenpox, > mr_wiggly, header_abuse, and tripwire. I have a well trained Bayes > database (all of the messages sneaking through seem to be utterly > baffling Bayes), and I'm using DCC and Razor2. > > Thoughts? > Thanks! > > Rubin (feeling like I'm getting drowned in spam still... I guess I got > spoiled when I was only seeing 1-2 spams per week that made it through) -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
