Hi Chris, I felt a bit bad for complaining, since the rules themselves are so great (I'm running pretty much all the addon .cfs on my setup). Given the choice between personalised descriptions and not having the rules at all -- I know what I would choose.
Keep up the good work - it's hugely appreciated by both myself and no doubt plenty of other sysadmins too! :) Kind regards, Daz > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 March 2004 17:38 > To: Darren Coleman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Depersonalising rule descriptions > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 5:34 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Depersonalising rule descriptions > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I just noticed this in the report of a spam I received received: > > > > 0.3 MY_MISC_BODY BODY: A few terms I don't like in body. > > > > I appreciate this is from an addon .cf, and was most probably > > written by > > someone originally for their own installation - but is there > > any reason > > for having such nondescript and personalised descriptions for > > the rules? > > I imagine its only a matter of time before a customer rings > > up and asks > > me "what terms don't you like?". > > > > Wouldn't it have just been better to say something like > > "BODY: Contains > > typical spam superlatives" or something? > > > > I know, I'm just being picky and I do appreciate the great > work Chris > > and others are putting into these addon rules. :) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Darren Coleman > > JPC InfoNet Ltd > > Technical Consultant & Lead Developer > > LOL, yeah that was one of my old babies. One of my first ones > I ever wrote. > I was a noob back then. We are working on changing and > standardizing(sp?) > all of this stuff. You may get more info then you could > possibly hope for in > the future. If all things go well. > > Thanks for the heads up though. Shows you're paying > attention. I may test a > few others by putting ads for Coke-a-Cola in my next descrition ;) > > --Chris >
