Hi Matt,

I have a follow-up question on this topic.  I am running SA on the same system 
as my mail server.  This system also acts as the NAT
system for our office.  The system has one public IP on NIC and a private IP on 
a second NIC acting as a gateway via NAT.

I too have the same whitelist issues.  I have several external addresses / 
domains that I have white listed with a plain
whitelist_from AND whitelist_from_rcvd and they are still caught as spam.

Do I need to use trusted_networks also?  I have watched my logs and seen other 
white listed addresses tagged correctly < -100 scores
but these nagging users keep getting missed.  I am about to also create custom 
rules to band-aid fix this issue.

Dan

BTW I am running SA 2.63.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:00 PM
> To: Pierre Thomson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: whitelist_from_rcvd - again
>
>
> At 04:38 PM 3/25/2004, Pierre Thomson wrote:
> >I'm having a heck of a time getting whitelist_from_rcvd to work AT ALL
> >since upgrading to 2.63 .  I have read the threads about trusted networks,
> >etc., but nothing seems to work.  (To be honest, I don't see the logic
> >behind it only working on trusted networks... it may foil some spoofs but
> >it makes administration a nightmare.)
> >
> >That said... I can't even get outgoing mail from our very own
> >192.168.1.XXX network to trigger a whitelist_from_rcvd rule, even when I
> >explicitly declare that network trusted.  I have had to resort to local
> >meta rulesets that check the From and Received lines for the desired
> >combination of strings
>
> That right there is your problem most likely... If you are using a NATed
> mailserver you MUST manualy declare trusted_networks. Otherwise SA
> mis-understands the mail headers and decides your SMTP gateway is a server
> outside your network.
>
> Try forcing a trusted_networks statement that contains _only_ your
> mailserver. Do not include your hosts. Do not include any outside ISPs.
> Just include your servers.
>

Reply via email to