On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 10:27, JC wrote:
> Should X-Company_ID and X-Campaign be considered definate spam-sign?
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_01 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_01 exists:X-Find
score SPAMMY_HEADER_01 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_02 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_02 exists:X-SP-Track-ID
score SPAMMY_HEADER_02 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_03 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_03 exists:X-Encoding-Version
score SPAMMY_HEADER_03 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_04 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_04 exists:X-Contact
score SPAMMY_HEADER_04 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_05 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_05 exists:X-LIDCode
score SPAMMY_HEADER_05 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_06 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_06 exists:X-TID
score SPAMMY_HEADER_06 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_07 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_07 exists:X-Campaign
score SPAMMY_HEADER_07 1.00
describe SPAMMY_HEADER_08 Has headers only spammers use
header SPAMMY_HEADER_08 Content-Transfer-Encoding =~ /^binary$/
score SPAMMY_HEADER_08 1.00
comments solicited.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Internal Systems Administrator/Guru voice: (425) 672-1304
Apropos Retail Management Systems, Inc. fax: (425) 672-0192
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Failure to plan ahead on someone else's part does not constitute an
emergency on my part.
- David W. Barts in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 days until Daylight Savings Time begins - Spring Forward
