Re: how did this get through?!?!?

[ajezierski]

"Hackworth, Keith A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/26/2004 03:06:01 PM:

> I need some suggestions building a rule for this one...  Only thing that
> hit was bayes - 40-44% probability of spam.  Of course, I trained bayes
> already.
>
> I'm running Postfix/Amavisd (with Spamassassin module).  Only cf file I
> have is my local and bigevil.
>
> Thanks,
> Keith
>
>
[snip]

Add some additional rules. Looks like Chris's new adult rules did the trick on this one. It scored 7.5 at my site.

X-Spam-Report:
        *  2.5 SARE_ADLTSUB6 Apparent spam seems to contain porn subject
        *  1.5 INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822)
        *  0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_52 BODY: {5}Letter - punctuation - {2}Letter
        *  1.7 SARE_OBFUFCK2 BODY: Apparent spam seems to contain porn subject
        *  0.6 SARE_BADGIRLS BODY: Contains phrasing used by spammers
        *  0.7 SARE_ADULT1 BODY: Contains adult material
        * -0.0 BAYES_44 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 44 to 50%
        *      [score: 0.4994]

Andy