I'm hoping that these will be useful. I'm already seeing them hit spam, I'm
hoping they don't hit too much ham. The SUPER*A rules will likely hit more ham
than the SUPER*B rules.
I'm thinking that spam is basically advertising that using a lot of
superlatives is standard fare for ads - and are probably less likely to be
obfuscated.
Also, if anyone thinks of more good superlatives - est, -er, -ly (like
totally, completely, absolutely), or others (amazing, unbelievable), etc. they
might be useful too.
Thanks, Al
full CTS_CIG3 /(?:\b(?:cig[a|e]rett(?:e|es))\b.*){3}/is
describe CTS_CIG3 Many cigarette
score CTS_CIG3 8.0
full CTS_CIG4 /(?:\b(?:cig[a|e]rett(?:e|es))\b.*){4}/is
describe CTS_CIG4 Many cigarette
score CTS_CIG4 20.0
full CTS_SUPER3A
/(?:\b(?:best|most|more|((?:bett|bigg|cheap|fast|larg|long|quick|young)(?:er|est)))\b.*){3}/is
describe CTS_SUPER3A Too good
score CTS_SUPER3A 0.01
full CTS_SUPER4A
/(?:\b(?:best|most|more|((?:bett|bigg|cheap|fast|larg|long|quick|young)(?:er|est)))\b.*){4}/is
describe CTS_SUPER4A Too good
score CTS_SUPER4A 0.01
full CTS_SUPER5A
/(?:\b(?:best|most|more|((?:bett|bigg|cheap|fast|larg|long|quick|young)(?:er|est)))\b.*){5}/is
describe CTS_SUPER5A Too good
score CTS_SUPER5A 0.01
full CTS_SUPER3B
/(?:\b(?:best|most|((?:bett|bigg|cheap|fast|larg|long|quick|young)(?:er|est)))\b.*){3}/is
describe CTS_SUPER3B Too good
score CTS_SUPER3B 0.01
full CTS_SUPER4B
/(?:\b(?:best|most|((?:bett|bigg|cheap|fast|larg|long|quick|young)(?:er|est)))\b.*){4}/is
describe CTS_SUPER4B Too good
score CTS_SUPER4B 0.01
full CTS_SUPER5B
/(?:\b(?:best|most|((?:bett|bigg|cheap|fast|larg|long|quick|young)(?:er|est)))\b.*){5}/is
describe CTS_SUPER5B Too good
score CTS_SUPER5B 0.01
