On Friday 26 March 2004 9:26 pm, Kai wrote: > Dynamic IP's (dialup/dsl/cable) are currently the biggest spam sources > of all, summarily trojaned/backdoored Windows machines, poorly/not > administered or patched.
No argument here...
> The following rules are very likely problematic for anyone who
> has actual users on dynamic-IP hosts relaying mail through their
> SpamAssassin-running mail relay, unless specific steps are taken
> to exempt such users from these rules.
[...]
> - header semantics have been matched and tested with Sendmail-generated
> headers ONLY, sorry. I'd be most interested in hearing from people trying
> these rules on Qmail/Postfix/other servers.
So, how does this message look to you? I use postfix [SuSE defaults to this
now...] I see from my last post to this very list, the following header:
Received: from bigbro.local (adsl-207-105-40-84.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net
[207.105.40.84])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtpauth2-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 auth mps/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
i2QFRi4A128520
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 10:27:44
-0500
�
[Which is actually a fixed IP -- I'm one of the lucky "old farts" that has had
DSL for ages now...] Of course, I'm relying on the fact that you are NOT
processing messages intended for this list :)
--
Top o' the Blog: Google Nirvana gone bye-bye?
http://osnut.homelinux.net/mtblog/ya_index.html
pgptGfjkpiv1l.pgp
Description: signature
