blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If sent mail with a From address of something like:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the message won't be marked with USER_IN_BLACKLIST:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 00:24:50 2004Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mail.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2T8OoXc014463
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from well.com (well.com [206.14.209.5])
by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2T8OoH1015357
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:50 -0800 (PST)Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2T8On0X027041
for vanilla; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:49 -0800 (PST)Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Keith Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Subject: TBTF ping for 2001-04-20: Reviving
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-the_well_u (2004-01-11) on
user.well.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.63-the_well_u
X-Spam-Level:
Blah
If the punctuation character is not the last character prior to the @, the blacklist mechanism appears to work:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 29 00:24:40 2004Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp.well.com (smtp.well.com [206.14.209.7]) by mail.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2T8Od7H014308 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from well.com (well.com [206.14.209.5]) by smtp.well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2T8Odqf015264 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by well.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2T8Ocju026790 for vanilla; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:24:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Keith Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: (SPAM?) TBTF ping for 2001-04-20: Reviving X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-the_well_u (2004-01-11) on user.well.com X-Spam-Report: * 100 USER_IN_BLACKLIST From: address is in the user's black-list X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=100.0 required=5.0 tests=USER_IN_BLACKLIST autolearn=no version=2.63-the_well_u X-Spam-Level: **************************************************
Blah
The precise character used doesn't seem to matter - if it isn't alphanumeric, a hyphen, or an underscore, SA seems to get confused.
-- Pete `-_-' http://www.well.com/user/wolfy http://www.fotolog.net/wolfy/
Fortune Documents the Great Legal Decisions:
We think that we may take judicial notice of the fact that the term "bitch"
may imply some feeling of endearment when applied to a female of the canine
species but that it is seldom, if ever, so used when applied to a female
of the human race. Coming as it did, reasonably close on the heels of two
revolver shots directed at the person of whom it was probably used, we think
it carries every reasonable implication of ill-will toward that person.
-- Smith v. Moran, 193 N.E. 2d 466.
