Chris Santerre said:

>
>    1502     1466       36    0.907   0.74   0.01  BigEvilList_X
>       0        0        0    0.500   0.12   0.01  BigEvilList_W
>     386      165      221    0.152   0.00   0.01  BigEvilList_Z
>     866       48      818    0.014   0.00   0.01  BigEvilList_Y
>
> Look at how bad the hammer/spammer is for X! I've sinced removed these
> test,
> as I wasn't sure people were using the results. But wow, that would seem
> to

X bad? looks pretty reasonable to me at S/0 of .907 (not great, though)...
However Y and Z both hit far more ham than spam! :)

--
Chris Thielen

Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch obfuscated spam
phrases(0BFU$C/\TED SPA/\/\ P|-|RA$ES):  http://www.sandgnat.com/cmos/
Keep up to date with the latest third party SpamAssassin Rulesets:
http://www.exit0.us/index.php/RulesDuJour

Reply via email to