On Tuesday 30 March 2004 3:19 am, Nick Leverton wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:14:47AM -0800, Tom Emerson wrote:
> > In any case, it is one to watch for [or rather, to watch for your friends
> > running "that rather susceptible system"]
>
> I would love to, but whilst you gave us snippets, you haven't given us
> the mail itself to see and try out !

well, I wouldn't want to intentionally submit a virus to an e-mail reflector, 
now would I? :)  That said, here is the content of the message [sans nasty 
attachment] for your enjoyment:

-------the message--------
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postoffice.pacbell.net [207.115.63.79]
        by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.3)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:19:35 -0800 
(PST)
Received: from vmj-ext.prodigy.net by vmj with SMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:11:57 
-0500
X-Originating-IP: [156.63.253.3]
Received: from pacbell.net (pix-n253-3.treca.org [156.63.253.3])
        by vmj-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2TJBtrf044712
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:11:56 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Submit a Virus Sample
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:10:51 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
  boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on osnut.homelinux.net
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART,
        MISSING_MIMEOLE,NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
        version=2.63
X-Spam-Level: *
X-UIDL: BZ<!!lB/"!HSZ"!>A3!!
Status: RO
X-Status: R

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: 

The sample file you sent contains a new virus version of buppa.k.
Please update your virus scanner with the attached dat file.

Best Regards,
 Keria Reynolds


------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
        name="signature_osnut.zip"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
        filename="signature_osnut.zip"

[virus snipped]
-------end of message-------

I've stripped out a couple of "received" and X-kmail-* headers as these are 
internal to my system / would be on all messages / would have no meaning to 
folks outside of my system -- I debated about removing the X-spam headers, 
but thought those might actually be useful for others to analyze/consider.

-- 
Top o' the Blog: Google Nirvana gone bye-bye?
http://osnut.homelinux.net/mtblog/ya_index.html

Attachment: pgpHVIfJScllK.pgp
Description: signature

Reply via email to