Well? Post it, if you dare!
-----Original Message----- From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:11 PM To: Jason Haar; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How about comparing text/plain with text/html? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jason Haar writes: > I don't know if this has been discussed before, but a lot of the SPAM that I > get now is "spammy" in the text/html part, and "bayes-unfriendly" in > the text/plain part. > > It seems to me that if you could strip the HTML out of the text/html part, > and some how compare it with the text/plain part (reuse the Bayes engine > perhaps?), that if they are grossly *different*, this would imply SPAM - as > all valid use of multipart/alternative tends to be that the text/html and > text/plain are just different marked-up versions of the same content... > > Has this already been discussed to death - and I just missed it? Yeah, we have a great rule that does that now ;) Theo implemented it. We really need to post more often to SpamAssassin-users about current new rules I think... ;) - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFAajbLQTcbUG5Y7woRAroLAJ0RmbG/pE5nrxkO+ily+8q2KxdmHQCeKvfq rlY0ZYwk/SY2oTMa3eZHZbM= =81K2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------ Mail was checked for spam by the Freeware Edition of No Spam Today! The Freeware Edition is free for personal and non-commercial use. You can remove this notice by purchasing a full license! To order or to find out more please visit: http://www.no-spam-today.com
