We had to stop using the ratware.cf because it was blowing out legit Outlook email. To many complaints
We haven't noticed any decrease in effectiveness without it at our end. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Daniel Quinlan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Bob Amen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: RE: False positive from T_RATWARE_OOPS_05 in ratware.cf | | | >-----Original Message----- | >From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | >Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 5:37 PM | >To: Bob Amen | >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | >Subject: Re: False postive from T_RATWARE_OOPS_05 in ratware.cf | > | > | >Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | >> We have an author who's email is consistently tagged | >due to this rule | >> (which has a default score of 6.1). There is no author listed on the | >> SARE page but I would like to communicate with the author and send a | >> copy of the email so we can figure out why it's hitting this rule. | >> | >> Can someone point me to the author? | > | >Style note: only test rules should be named with a "T_" prefix. The | >default score in SA for test rules is 0.001 for a reason. | | good point. I'll pass the T_ info on to SARE. | | > | >Incidentally, that may be a good sign to not use the rule, especially | >off of an authorless SARE page. | | With SARE, you don't just get one author. You get over 20! So finding | someone to fix a problem is easier then finding a single author ;) | | But you don't have to use any SARE rules if you don't want :-) We try to | please everyone. So far we can't get past 99.5% satisfaction. ;) | | --Chris | | > | >Daniel | > | >-- | >Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, | >http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/ and open source consulting | >
